WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: FRC vs Metal ceramic backup 814 pm, its inability to support longer edentulous spans, facial surface has a 1.0- to 2 0-mm-wide metal collar, excellent clinical service record with promise of durability and longevity, ceramic layer achieved by accrurate appearance match, Metal-Ceramic Crown also known as porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration, thin metal cast coping fits over tooth preparation, Advantages include excellent esthetics, thin metal cast coping which may be a recognizable cast crown, Advantages includes excellent clinical service record, lingual surface has 3.0 metal collar, Advantages includes strength, combination wherein the facial surface, be placed on non-moisture-free areas eg. gingival sulcus as an adhesive cementation technique, Composite resin luting materials can be used only in situations in which the operator can maintain a contamination-free field., Advantages includes less preparation requirement, tooth preparation which is a combination, Fiber Reinforced Composite categorized according to Type of fiber, lack of metal or opaque materials which provides natural appearance at the cervical aspect of the retainer, high compressive strength although low tensile strength, Disadvantages has porcelain